15th March - The widow of Nain

The widow of Nain: Luke 7 v 11-17: ‘Young man, I say to you, get up!’

As a curate long ago I remember knocking on the door of a house one particular evening as part of an ongoing visiting project. It was entirely co-incidental that I was on that doorstep that night but one member of the family living there, who had no previous connection with church, had just that day finished reading a copy of John’s Gospel. It had, in his words, ‘changed him’ and this ‘chance meeting’ was an important moment in his spiritual journey as we were able to talk through then and there what he had been reading and its impact on him.

Today’s reading is about Jesus and his disciples being in the right place at the right time; a ‘chance encounter’ as they happen to enter the village of Nain in the middle of a funeral procession involving the entire community. A mother is burying her only son having already, at some time in the past, buried her husband. Not only is it a deeply felt personal loss, it potentially leaves her destitute as the two men who could provide her with an income are now both now dead.

Let’s just pause a moment and consider the intuitive emotional response of Jesus in this passage. Mark tells us that ‘his heart went out to her’ (v 13). Jesus encountered tragic and distressing situations throughout his ministry and in spite of (or because of) the fact that he was so often able to provide miraculous healing this would surely have taken its toll on him. Yet as he watches the funeral of an unknown person in a town that wasn’t his home his heart is full and he feels for the woman’s loss so keenly that he cannot stand by. It is a reminder to us that Jesus is not the kind of miracle worker who rises above it all and is untouched by the pain and sorrow he encounters; there is always a cost to those who really care and there surely was for him. One of the reasons that he very often went off on his own for hours on end, much to the consternation of the baffled disciples (Mark 1 v 35-37), was to pour it all out to his heavenly Father and ask for ongoing strength for the task.

So it’s important that we understand the real emotional engagement that Jesus makes with this bereaved mother. We can perhaps imagine silence falling as he gently encourages the mother to still her tears. Time seems to stand still as he approaches the young man’s bier with the intention of significantly delaying his burial. As he touches the coffin there is perhaps a sharp intake of breath as any such contact would, according to the beliefs of the time, render him unclean - once again Jesus goes out on a limb. As life returns to the dead body and words pour forth from his mouth he is ‘given back’ to his mother (v 15). His life henceforth is a divine gift which will profoundly shape the lives of both mother and son in the years to come.

Two thoughts occur. Firstly that although this mother received her child back and Mary, even after having her soul pierced as she watched her son die naked on a Roman cross, was a witness to his resurrection, all other parents who face the loss of a child do so without the happy ending. I once heard of a priest visiting a family who had lost a child and remarking, ‘this isn’t God’s fault, you know’. I wouldn’t have blamed them for ejecting him from the premises without ceremony. Those who have experienced such crushing loss and those who have ministered to them will understand the impossibility of explaining why, for instance, childhood cancers take such young and precious lives. Jesus’ ministry was a signpost pointing us to what the kingdom of God looks like; it was never designed to establish a universal panacea for the world’s pain or provide us with a way of explaining it. This is why there are times when words do more harm than good; sometimes it is just being there that speaks more eloquently than a thousand words.

Secondly we need to remember that by raising her son, Jesus ministered to this mother on more than one level. We noted earlier that as he turned her tears of mourning to tears of joy he also addressed her financial vulnerability. In a previous study we noted the plight of widows in the days when most women relied on their menfolk for financial security. In the course of Paul’s detailed instructions to Timothy he makes it clear that those who fail in their duty to provide adequately for vulnerable family members have ‘denied their faith’ (1 Tim 5 v 4, 8). The son will now have the opportunity to fulfil his own responsibilities to his mother.

Visiting the bereaved and the sick, conducting baptisms, weddings and funerals, leading worship and preaching, leading Bible studies and helping people think through their own personal faith and walk with God are a central parts of the church’s vocation and in parish ministry I spent lots of time doing all of those things. Yet in the UK today churches are also involved in running food banks, debt counselling services and breakfast clubs for children from low income families as well as helping people into employment, providing street pastors for city centres at weekends and providing food, drink and accommodation to those living on the streets amongst many, many other things. Christians are also involved in mission and relief projects across the globe. The day before writing this, my wife and I delivered 137 shoeboxes filled with such things as notebooks, pencils, hats, gloves and small toys that had been donated by many generous people to a Christian organisation based near Preston who will be taking them to disadvantaged children in Ukraine. It’s just one small expression of care among very many.

As far as both the ministry of Jesus and his church is concerned there is no distinction between what we might call the spiritual and the social. By way of a chance meeting in Nain Jesus brought both joy and a more certain future to a widow in a single act of compassion. Whilst global news coverage means that we are all keenly aware of an ocean of need in our less than perfect world, which can overwhelm us if we’re not careful, it is important that we all do something rather than nothing in response. The following words of the Franciscan priest Richard Rohr in the context of addressing issues of inequality and injustice particularly struck me when I read them the other day, ‘I believe that if we can do one or two things wholeheartedly in our life, that is all God expects.’ I think there is great wisdom here and it is in the ‘wholehearted’ nature of whatever we do in response to God’s call that the personal commitment and sacrifice lies. So what one or two things could you do?

 

Questions: Do you have difficult questions to ask God about things that have happened in your own life or those of people you care about? In what way is addressing poverty and inequality part of the mission of the church?

Prayer: Lord Jesus, you gave the widow her son back, open us to your call and help us to share your gifts generously and wholeheartedly. Amen.

14th March - The one who is ‘for us’

The one who is ‘for us’: Mark 9 v 38-41: ‘…because he was not one of us.’

The 2020 presidential election emphasised the fault lines that now run through society in the United States of America. I read recently of one person cancelling Christmas plans and another moving her wedding date in order to avoid meeting family members on the other side of the increasingly wide political chasm that is causing such damaging division. The political question in an increasing number of countries seems to be, ‘are you with us or against us’?

This sort of exclusive mindset has been the cause of some of the deepest wounds of Christian history such as when, in 1054, the Roman Catholic Pope and the Eastern Orthodox Patriarch mutually excommunicated each other causing a tear in the body of Christ that remains unhealed to this day. In 1204, those who had embarked on the Fourth Crusade went even further and destroyed the Christian city of Constantinople, raping nuns and killing indiscriminately as they went about it. To the Crusaders, the people of Constantinople were not ‘their kind of Christians’, and were therefore fair game. An apology, from Pope John Paul II, in which he stated, ‘it is tragic that the assailants, who set out to secure free access for Christians to the Holy Land, turned against their brothers in the faith. The fact that they were Latin Christians fills Catholics with deep regret’, took 800 years to arrive.

In today’s reading Jesus himself is completely relaxed about the activities of the unnamed exorcist who is worrying John purely because he is, ‘not one of us’. Maybe the stranger had seen Jesus teaching, healing and casting out demons and been inspired to follow suit; we just don’t know. Neither do we know anything about his understanding of who Jesus was and what his ministry was all about. We’ll assume that it was even more limited than that of the disciples whose own grasp on things was pretty shaky at this stage. Yet Jesus doesn’t ask his disciples to grab him and bring him over for a grilling to see what he’s about neither does he seem at all interested in finding out more about him or regard him as any kind of threat.

The simple challenge to John is that if this exorcist is performing miracles in Jesus’ name how can he be an adversary and therefore why on earth should anybody try to stop him (v 39)? Yet still today Christians are looking at other Christians from different traditions and maintaining that they are not ‘one of us’. Within the Christian church there have always been different understandings of key elements of the faith such as the Bible, the Eucharist, the Church, the Mission of God in the world and the scope of salvation. It is very important that the conversations we continue to have about all these issues and many others remain friendly, mutually affirming and generous. All too often, however, they are rancorous, spiteful and lacking in any kind of warmth. What so often bedevils the conversations we need so much to keep going is the belief that ‘we’ (whichever part of the Christian tradition ‘we’ belong to) are absolutely right in what we believe which means that ‘they’ are necessarily entirely wrong. This often leads people to look on those who take a different view (which could even be a somewhat nuanced version of what they themselves believe) as not proper Christians at all. Now obviously all Christians believe things about Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection and the way in which his followers should behave in the world today but the misguided belief that you can have this faith thing completely buttoned up betrays a breathtaking arrogance entirely out of sympathy with the generosity of spirit Jesus extends to the unnamed exorcist that John disparages.

Of course, for Jesus, any belief is meaningless if your actions don’t stack up; as he says elsewhere, ‘by their fruits, you will recognise them’ (Mat 7 v 16). It is not necessarily those who prophesy, drive out demons or even say, ‘Lord, Lord’ who are getting it right. Rather it is those who demonstrate in the way they live their lives that they are attentive to the will of God (Mat 7 v 21-22) who are on a meaningful journey of faith. It is noteworthy that here and elsewhere, as in his dealings with the religious authorities of his day, Jesus reserves his harshest criticism for those who say one thing and do another (Mat 23 v 27-28). That is why the final verse of our short passage is so important; anyone who does something as seemingly insignificant as offering a thirsty person a drink of water in Jesus’ name is getting it right (v 41). The clear implication is that all of us who take the Christian life seriously should be prepared to work, worship and pray alongside those who, like the unknown exorcist for John, are not part of our Christian tradition and who may have different understandings, ways of worshipping and ways of doing mission to those we most readily relate to. Which begs the question of how well we know people who attend other churches in our community? So why not go along to a different church than your own from time to time and get to know some of your fellow Christians who do things differently. And do this with an open heart as one seeking to learn and grow rather than taking into that experience a sense of spiritual superiority.

There is an echo in this passage of the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats (Mat 25 v 31-46) in which those who minister to Jesus himself by feeding the hungry, giving the thirsty a drink, inviting in the stranger, clothing the naked and visiting the sick and those in prison are entirely unaware of what they are doing (Mat 25 v 37). In the light of this I’m tempted to push the envelope a bit further and suggest that anyone at all who offers a thirsty person a drink of water or offers any act of kindness to a fellow human being, whatever their beliefs might be (in other words, people of all faiths and none), are doing the compassionate work that is humanity’s shared vocation. What Jesus is implying here is that such people, who show themselves by their actions to be doing the work of God, are in an important sense our partners in mission; something implicitly acknowledged by the fact that, as well as Christian relief agencies such as Tear Fund, Christian Aid and CAFOD, the charities who work together on the Disasters Emergency Committee include the secular agency Oxfam and Islamic Relief. This means that when workers from Oxfam dig a bore hole in a village in Africa providing the residents with access to clean water, or when Islamic Relief feed those facing starvation because of the conflict in Yemen, Christians should rejoice because the thirsty are being given a drink and the hungry are being fed (Mat 25 v 35). 

None of this means that our own Christian beliefs are compromised; after all elsewhere in the Bible Paul quotes Greek philosophers Aratus and Epimenides as part of his presentation of the good news in Athens (Acts 17 v 28) and the compiler of the book of Proverbs includes a section based on an Egyptian wisdom book called The Instruction of Amenemope (Prov 22 v 17 – 24 v 22). The message seems to be that ‘even though these people don’t believe what we believe, when they are saying and doing good things God is at work’. God is working on a much bigger canvas than is often apparent to us with our limited perspective; something that should both challenge us and make us glad.

 

Questions: Where can you see, both around you and in your own heart, an ‘us and them’ mentality? How might you challenge this and be changed yourself in the process?

Prayer: Lord, give us generosity of spirit, an open heart and the vision to see what you are doing in the world and be part of it. Amen.

13th March - The woman subject to bleeding

The woman subject to bleeding: Mark 5  v 24b-34: ‘Your faith has healed you.’

In the days when you could just turn up at a football ground and pay to go through the turnstiles I went with some friends to Anfield, the home of Liverpool Football Club, to see them play Barcelona in the European Cup (which has since evolved into the cash cow known as the Champions League). In those days the Kop was a standing terrace behind one of the goals and I can vividly remember, whenever the play came down our end, being lifted off my feet in a great wave of people and carried in the air several yards down the terrace before being carried up and back to my starting point when play moved up the other end.

Today’s story describes a chaotic crowd of people trying desperately to get close to Jesus at a time when he had quite a reputation as a healer around the towns and villages of Galilee. He is on his way to the house of Jairus, a local synagogue official whose 12 year old daughter is close to death, when something quite strange happens. When Jesus heals people it is usually done intentionally and out of love and compassion yet here is an example of an inadvertent healing which Jesus only becomes aware of after the event in that ‘power had gone out from him’ (v 30). It feels a little impersonal; almost as if Jesus worked on a battery which lost a bit of its charge as its power caused the woman’s internal bleeding to cease instantaneously. Perhaps this is one reason why Jesus doesn’t allow the woman to scuttle away unnoticed after receiving the healing she desperately craved. As we reflect on this woman who now stands face to face with Jesus let’s think about the ramifications of her condition for a moment.

We need to consider firstly what it was doing to her body. She had been ‘subject to bleeding’ for twelve long years (v 25). Whether this was caused by heavy menstrual bleeding or some other medical condition isn’t clear but whereas in today’s NHS she would have been able to visit her local GP and be referred to a consultant if necessary, back then she was in the hands of doctors with very rudimentary knowledge who charged her for the privilege of consultations which only made matters worse (v 26). Her condition was not life threatening, unlike Jairus’s daughter she is not dying, but it was both painful and distressing on a daily basis. It meant that she and anything she touched was regarded as ritually unclean (see Lev 15 v 25-27) and as a result of this she was excluded from the life of the synagogue of which Jairus, whose daughter she was preventing Jesus from seeing, was an official. The effect of this ritual exclusion was that anybody else coming into contact with anything she had lain on, sat on or even just touched would also become unclean. It’s an ancient example of social distancing and the restrictions and lockdowns we have experienced during the pandemic give us an idea of the fear that lurked behind these beliefs and practises.

So what was it doing to her mind? Because she was shunned and excluded she must have led an incredibly lonely life. For many vulnerable people the pandemic has meant many months of not being able to see family and friends and they will have an understanding of what her feelings were. However she did not have access to zoom, social media or a telephone; she was to all intents and purposes alone in the world. If the pandemic has taught us one thing it is the value of friendship; we were certainly not made to be alone. Hence the desperation of this woman who puts herself at the heart of something akin to an enormous rugby scrum to get close to Jesus. She is physically healed, something she realises instantly, but she still needs Jesus – he isn’t a magician dispensing healings without engaging with the people he comes into contact with. It isn’t battery power but God’s loving, life giving power that has healed this woman and there needs to be a conversation. That’s why Jesus keeps looking (v 32); he isn’t going to let her slip away.

There are two important things their conversation achieves. Firstly because her healing now becomes public knowledge it makes it much easier for her to be accepted back into the community. Jesus is taking a risk here with his own reputation because according to the letter of the law he himself has been rendered unclean simply by having her touch his garment (even though his disciples make the valid point that in the chaos nobody would have had a clue who had touched his clothes - v 31). But her healing and restoration have to be public; Jesus is not just concerned with her physical healing, he wants to heal the whole person. He wants her to be able to be close to any family she may have, he wants her to be able to go to the synagogue, he wants her to feel valued, wanted, loved and cared for.

Secondly it clarifies the role that her faith played in her healing, as Jesus puts it; ‘Daughter, your faith has healed you (v 34). It may not have been fully formed, but a desperate kind of hope that touching the healer’s cloak might just deliver her was enough. She was only at the beginning of her journey of faith but she was free (v 34). Not just free from the pain and discomfort of her medical condition but from the experience of waking up each day knowing that she would spend that day alone and as an object of fear. We can only imagine what that had been doing to her sense of self-esteem.

We might well feel that our faith is a fragile flower and very much prey to the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. As we look at other Christians whose faith seems so much stronger and who seem to know so much more about the Bible than we do we can sometimes feel like giving up. Apart from the fact that those we regard in that way almost certainly have issues of their own we can see in this story that even a ‘last resort’ kind of faith with very little knowledge and understanding but with a deep longing for a different kind of life – whatever might mean for us in the context of our own lives – evinces a response from Jesus. And the fact that, for us, our engagement with Jesus might or might not result in physical healing, doesn’t mean that our faith and walk with Jesus is any the less meaningful and significant. Jesus’ wider concern for the mental, emotional and spiritual scars that this unknown woman would have potentially carried with her long after her physical healing is a very significant part of the story.

It is our understanding of how Jesus accepts us with all our doubts, questions, hang-ups, fears and uncertainties that will help us as Christians to offer a non-judgemental welcome to others who come searching even as they are not quite sure what they are looking for. Jesus takes anyone and everyone as they are and where they are and invites them on a journey of faith. Just like Rome, that cannot be built in a day and the Christian life is not a beauty contest in which we are endlessly comparing ourselves to others. We are all broken in one way or another and the acknowledgement of this is an essential prerequisite for growth in spiritual life and faith. As we embark on, continue or re-engage with the life of faith we will always be encountering the love of God who forgives what is past, accepts who we are today and shapes and guides our future. Even in the chaos that sometimes constitutes our daily lives, it’s all rather wonderful!

 

Questions: Have you ever experienced chaos in your spiritual life? How has living through that shaped your walk with Jesus today and how might it shape where you go from here?

Prayer: Lord, accept us as we are and lead and guide us into the future you have prepared for us. Amen.

12th March -The Paralytic

The paralytic: ‘Mark 2 v 1-12: …get up, take your mat and go home’

I cannot imagine a world without friends. Our experience of a time when self-isolating and social distancing became part and parcel of daily life has made us realise just what a precious gift friendship is. The paralysed man in today’s reading was very blessed to have some brilliant mates without whom he would never have met Jesus. Having just arrived back home (v 1) and no doubt in need of some peace and quiet Jesus is besieged with locals who surround his home meaning that these indefatigable friends have to carry the paralysed man up onto the flat roof of the house in which Jesus was staying, dig through the packed clay and lower him to ground level.

The response of Jesus is to the faith of the friends rather than the paralysed man himself yet it is to him that he address the words, ‘Son, your sins are forgiven’, (v 5) that lie at the heart of the story. At that time it was assumed that there was a causal link between sin and suffering yet, in a radical departure from received wisdom, we know that Jesus didn’t buy into this (see John 9 v 1-3). Jesus is not saying to the man, ‘you’ve got this condition because you are a particularly bad person’, he is simply meeting a fundamental need, shared by every single one of us, for forgiveness.

The legal experts looking on know (rightly!) that only God can forgive sins but fail to recognise the divine authority of Jesus. Exactly what Jesus meant with his self-designation as the ‘Son of Man’ (v 10) has been debated exhaustively but most obviously is an allusion to a figure described in the book of Daniel (Dan 7 v 13-14) who is given authority and is an object of worship which can only mean he shares the divine nature. What seemed impossible to the teachers of the law was that this authority was being made visible in a residential house in Capernaum that’s just had an enormous hole gouged in its roof. But that is exactly what is happening.

What Jesus does by healing the man is make visible a profound depth of love and care for one vulnerable and sick person that sits alongside the authority he is claiming for himself. The paralysed man himself speaks with actions rather than words in this story; he just gets up, picks up the mat that he is no longer imprisoned on and walks out in a very public demonstration of the authority of Jesus over sin and sickness (v 12).

So there were two very significant things that Jesus did for the paralysed man. Firstly, he healed him, thereby delivering him from total dependency and opening new opportunities to him such as being able to work, to be free to go exactly where he wanted to, to build new relationships, to marry and have children or even to make a mess of things. Whilst his healing ministry was central to Jesus’ vocation and the Christian healing ministry has continued more or less (quite often less) over the centuries, Paul’s thorn in the flesh (2 Cor 12 v 7-9) and Timothy’s frequent illnesses (1 Tim 5 v 23) resonate with our own lived experience that many people of deep Christian faith and commitment are not healed from sicknesses and disabilities. One thing worth throwing in here, of course, is that health care provision is now off the scale better than it was in Jesus’ day and that there is a miraculous element to that which is often overlooked. God is as much at work (and far more frequently!) through surgeons and other health professionals as he is through those involved in the church’s healing ministry. I wonder if God’s response to Paul’s pleading regarding his ‘thorn’ helps us to understand why suffering is as much a part of life for Christians as it is for everybody else; ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness’ (2 Cor 12 v 9). So much learning and transformation takes place in the crucible of suffering. I have experienced that as will many reading these words. There are times when we know in our innermost being that, ‘when I am weak, then I am strong’ (2 Cor 12 v 10).

This, of course, leads us away from any thought that sickness or disabilities of any kind are judgements of God. The idea of redemptive suffering, as we see in the suffering and death of Jesus, allows no place for this kind of thinking (which has proved remarkably enduring). Whilst we can sometimes see, for instance in the context of drug and alcohol abuse, that suffering is a consequence of (for want of a better term) sinful behaviour, that does not mean that an illness or disability or any other kind of particular problem any of us struggle with means that we are receiving a specific punishment from God. My experience of pastoral ministry over the years informs me that this is something people do worry about.

A corollary of this is that we are often unable to explain the reasons for specific suffering. There are times when gut wrenching anguish such as that associated with a distressing long term illness means that the search for any kind of meaning is lost in the pain. The French Catholic poet Paul Claudel wrote that, ‘Jesus did not come to explain suffering or remove it. He came to fill it with his presence.’ Many of those who knew and loved Jesus similarly found themselves unable to come to terms with his suffering and death. It was only in the light of the empty tomb that a hope that reached into and went beyond suffering became real.

The second significant thing Jesus did was to offer the paralysed man the forgiveness of sins, (which is what got him into hot water with the legal experts looking on - v 6-7). It is very clear that, to state the obvious, this man is not alive today which means that at some point in the future he got sick and died. So whereas his physical healing was wonderful, increased his quality of life dramatically and filled him with faith and hope, it was of temporal significance. His experience of forgiveness, however, was of eternal significance and reminds us that healing is about more than bodies temporarily being made to work properly again but encompasses our mental, emotional and spiritual lives. Many of us, Christians very much included, carry guilt around with us – I look back even to mistakes made decades ago and still wince every now and again. Sometimes these memories can chain us to the past meaning that we are unable to apprehend the extraordinary beauty of the love that God offers to us today. There is nothing you or I have done or could ever do that will stop God from loving and forgiving us. That doesn’t mean that acts of selfishness, cruelty or thoughtlessness don’t matter and there are times in life when we will need to face the consequences of our actions. Yet God’s love is persistent and addresses us and all of humanity every moment of our lives did we but know it. In receiving God’s forgiveness the paralysed man discovered, probably much to his surprise, the deepest truth about himself; that he was loved by God. That is our deepest truth also.

 

Questions: Do you still feel guilty for things you thought, said or did in the past? Imagine yourself to be face to face with Jesus; what do you think he would say to you?

Prayer: Lord Jesus, thank you for your healing love. Help us to open our hearts and minds to you to receive all that you offer to us and to share it with others. Amen.

11th March -The Samaritan woman

The Samaritan woman: John 4 v 1-26: ‘I who speak to you am he’

Many car satellite navigation systems provide a number of alternative ways of getting from A to B including the shortest route, the fastest route and the most eco-friendly route. They also warn of hazards ahead such as roadworks and accidents and route us around them. Because of the entrenched antipathy between Jews and Samaritans, rooted in events of past centuries which had not been forgotten, Jewish people wishing to travel north to Galilee often had to take a major detour to avoid the hazardous journey through Samaria (where a racially motivated attack was always a danger) which added considerable time and distance to the journey.

Jesus and his disciples took no such detour but had managed to reach the town of Sychar, not a safe place for a group of Jews to be, without incident. The local well is the setting for an encounter that demonstrates just how radical is the Messiah who the Samaritan woman finds sitting on the well she has come to use. In addressing her and asking her for a drink Jesus is effectively driving a coach and horses through time honoured and deeply ingrained prejudices of his time and culture relating to morality, gender and race. To our minds there is nothing particularly unusual in this encounter; but at that time and in that place Jesus’ actions were dynamite.

As Jesus reached across the chasm that separated his people from her people the conversation included the complexities of her own personal life but focused mainly on the offer of living water and the nature of true worship. It’s clear that she was someone who found relationships difficult. She has been married five times and presumably divorced five times which would have given her a certain reputation locally (which is why she avoids coming to the well with the rest of the local women in the cooler conditions in the early morning or late evening). Jesus knows all this but starts by asking for her help because he is thirsty; an act in itself culturally scandalous. But it is important in the context of the conversation that Jesus subsequently has with this woman that she has just done something to help him.

As Christians we very properly put a lot of emphasis on what we can do for others both in terms of meeting the needs we see around us and sharing the Christian message. But being able to receive is also important and often undervalued. Back in the early 1990s I was involved in a project that provided finance and resources for a project to help orphan children in the city of Timişoara in Romania not long after the fall of the communist regime. Whilst we were ostensibly there to help it was extremely important that we also allowed people to give to us. We were invited to meals on many occasions and were very much aware that our hosts were giving to us sacrificially; there really wasn’t all that much food to go round and a lot of queueing was sometimes required to get it. Yet if we had refused hospitality and effectively said (not necessarily in words but communicated nonetheless), ‘we’ve come here to give to you and you have nothing of value to give to us’ it would have reflected an attitude of superiority which, whether we meant it to or not, would have undermined the self-esteem and offended the hospitable nature of those who simply wanted to give something back.  

So Jesus talks about water to one who has given him water to satisfy his thirst in the burning heat of the noonday sun; the conversation could not have taken place without his willingness to receive from her. Of course he is talking about a different kind of water and just as Nicodemus, when he hears the phrase ‘you must be born again’, can only see a ridiculous mental image of people entering their mother’s womb a second time (John 3 v 4), so the Samaritan woman finds it hard to think that Jesus is offering anything other than a supply of drinkable water that will obviate the need to keep visiting the well (v 15). Yet this living or running water is a metaphor for the life and presence of God within the human heart. Jesus is saying that because God is spirit (v 24), worshippers do not have to travel to a specific location to get near to him, whether that be Jerusalem or Mount Gerizim (where the Samaritan Temple stood), instead he longs to find a home in the human heart (John 14 v 23).

This truth has had great relevance for Christians during lockdown as churches have been closed and the only way to access worship is online. For those without internet access the estrangement from public worship has been all the more painful. To know that Jesus lives in our hearts wherever we are and that we can pray, read our Bibles, sing songs of worship and praise and thank him for his love at home or wherever we happen to be has been of paramount importance. However this doesn’t mean that going to church is relegated to being an optional extra; the writer to the Hebrews specifically encourages his readers not to neglect the act of worshipping with others (Heb 10 v 25). So, for example, remembering the sacrifice of Jesus as we celebrate Holy Communion together in church is a hugely formative experience for those who follow him, which is why he commands us to do it (Luke 22 v 19). Yet many clergy also take Holy Communion to members of the church who are housebound, in hospital or in care emphasising that ‘place’, whilst significant (bearing in mind that Jesus does attach an importance to the Jerusalem Temple in what he says - v 22) is not the be all and end all.

The most important thing about worship, says Jesus, is that it is ‘in spirit and in truth’ (v 24). When we worship God, whether we are physically in church, watching a service online or reading our Bibles and praying at home, what really matters is that it is a transformative encounter with the living God. We can go to church all our lives and say and sing all the right words but still not have our hearts touched or set on fire. Worship, giving to God what he is worth, is about being open to change; when we truly find room in our hearts for him it will transform us. The Samaritan woman with the complex love life and terrible reputation locally becomes an evangelist, telling those who shun her in the street and snigger behind her back that she may well have found the Messiah (John 4 v 29). She isn’t sure but the bravery with which she turns to the community that spurned her and opens her heart to them suggests that real transformation has taken place.

She doesn’t understand everything and there is still a journey ahead (which we know nothing about). As we worship, not just with our lips but in our hearts and minds in spirit and in truth, we too know that we are only part way there. Worship is more than lip service, it has to be real and reflect a genuine desire to put God at the heart of our lives. Only when we consciously and intentionally place ourselves in the presence of God can the living water flow. We might feel that, having once known that spring within, the water has become somewhat stagnant and we are somewhat becalmed. The Samaritan woman can inspire us to find who we really are once again. If we feel we are walking through a spiritual desert, this passage offers us living water to drink that will well up to eternal life (v 14). It is by drinking deep that the thirst for God that all humans possess, whether they are conscious of it or not, can be satisfied forever.

 

Questions: What does mean to you to worship ‘in spirit and in truth’? How can we prevent our Christian lives from becoming dry and running into the sand?

Prayer: Lord Jesus, as we worship you in spirit and in truth, touch our hearts, open us to the streams of living water you offer us, and enable us to share the water of life with others. Amen.

10th March -Simeon

Simeon: Luke 2 v 25-35: ‘My eyes have seen your salvation’

Waiting can be a real pain! It’s something that we are less and less used to when it’s now possible to order something from the internet and have it delivered within the hour. We tend to regard time spent waiting as time wasted. However the writer Sue Monk Kidd offers us a very different perspective when she says, ‘I had tended to view waiting as mere passivity. When I looked it up in my dictionary however, I found that the words passive and passion come from the same Latin root. Waiting is both passive and passionate. It’s a vibrant, contemplative work.’ Her words are particularly helpful as we consider Simeon. Having understood that his life would not end until he had seen the promised Messiah, are we to think that he spent his time twiddling his thumbs until he showed up? I think not.

His was a passionate, vibrant kind of waiting rather than the kind of waiting that ends up with us losing the will to live. His life was defined by his openness to the Holy Spirit (v 25-26) and when the Spirit is at work life is rarely boring. It’s not stated explicitly, but his act of blessing Joseph, Mary and Jesus (v 34) suggests that Simeon was a Temple priest, further emphasising that his was an active rather than a passive waiting. His was a patient hope which endured as he lived day to day life with all its light and shade, times of busyness and rest, of health and sickness, of stress and calm. 

Not only did his passionate waiting shape his own life; his ardent hope and openness to the Spirit would have touched the lives of many others in the course of his ministry at the Temple. For Simeon waiting was joyous and expectant. It would, of course, be wrong to think that all this joy was unalloyed; there would have been times when the vision grew dim and he wondered whether the Messiah would ever come. But his life’s work came to fruition as he held the child in his arms. We too can embrace passionate and active waiting. We are not called, as we wait for the return of Christ, to gaze upward and be no earthly use. Instead, we need to have a passion for God’s kingdom to grow, for justice and peace to fill the earth, for the binding up of the broken hearted and for deep peace to transform a fractured world.

Over the Christian centuries people have popped up from time to time convinced of the imminence of the return of Christ; they have all been wrong. In order to see the focus of all our hopes it would be better for us to look back to the child in Simeon’s arms. There are two Greek words for the English word ‘time’. ‘Chronos’ means chronological time. I happen to be writing this at 11.15am on a Tuesday morning and will soon be popping downstairs to make a cup of coffee. It’s just another day. ‘Kairos’ is much more about the right time or the opportune moment that lends significance to an event far beyond its place in series of events that took place on a certain day, week, month or year. For us that might be our wedding day, the day we heard that we passed our driving test or the day our child or grandchild was born. In the New Testament kairos moments at those at which God says or does something profoundly significant that reveals, fulfils or transforms. When John the Baptist cries, ‘The time has come…the kingdom of God is near, Repent and believe the good news!’ (Mark 1 v 15), it is the word kairos that is used. The moment is now, says John, it’s time to get off your backsides and do something about it.

As Simeon holds Jesus in his arms we can see that this also is a kairos moment; one that was meant to be. Two people, one at the very end of his life and the other at the very beginning were meant to meet at this precious moment. The text suggests that Simeon wasn’t actually on duty when Jesus was brought in to the Temple but that the Spirit gave him a nudge (v 27) to make sure he did not miss the divine appointment. In poetic words that have been known to generations of Anglicans as the ‘Nunc Dimittis’, sung at evensong week by week, this helpless infant is revealed as the one who has come not just for the people of Israel but the whole world  (v 29-32). Simeon, steeped in the traditions of Israel, was able to see a new and further horizon as he gazed at the child who was born for all of humanity.

And then a more sombre note is sounded. Mary has to be prepared for the sword that will pierce her soul as a sword is plunged into the side of her son as he dies on the cross. The child’s relationship with the people of Israel will be ambivalent (v 34) and costly. Not everybody was as open to the Holy Spirit as Simeon, not everyone saw the further horizon he descried. Whilst Jesus certainly is the Messiah he is not going to lead a war of liberation against the Roman occupiers. He will save, reveal and bring glory but only by walking the way of the cross.

Perhaps it is time for us to become more open to the Holy Spirit. We live in a distracted age and we need to give ourselves time to sit, rest, be open and receive. This cannot be done in a quick couple of seconds in the middle of a busy day. There needs to be intentionality, a definite decision that God will be at the heart of our lives rather than an added extra when can find a bit of time. Think of Simeon who waited and waited, and then saw. If we follow his example we will find that our hearts and minds will be more open to God’s presence and his love. We spend so much time skittering along the surface without ever taking the inner journey to uncover the Christ who lives in the deep places of our hearts where the Holy Spirit is present. As we take that journey it will be, as it was for Simeon, a journey of revelation. It won’t always be easy and swords may pierce our souls from time to time. But as we wait on the Lord with expectancy and commitment we might want to spend some time reflecting on the picture before us of Simeon holding the precious child and open our hearts to receive the love revealed at that most wonderful of moments.

Questions: What does ‘active waiting’ mean to you? Have you ever found your faith growing dim? How can we open ourselves more fully to the Holy Spirit?

Prayer: Lord, give us an openness to the Holy Spirit that we may both wait patiently and work actively for the coming of your kingdom. Amen.

Update 27

Good Afternoon Friends,

I said I would write following yesterday’s PCC meeting to share with you the decision made about resuming Public Worship at St Michaels.

It has been agreed that St Michaels will reopen for Public Worship fully from Sunday 21st March. This reopening will see our pattern of services return to what happening before Christmas with services at 8am, 10am and 6.30pm on a Sunday with a midweek service on Wednesdays at 10.30am.

It has also been agreed that we will continue to follow the pattern where the celebration of Holy Communion will rotate around the various services.

The reason for looking to reopen fully on Sunday 21st March is to allow time for rota’s to be developed and service plans created whilst also giving time to observe what is happening with the local infection rates as schools return.

The PCC and I are very aware that there are members of our church family who have been shielding and who have been and continue to serve on the front line of the covid-19 response. For these people, whilst they long to return to church to worship with our community in person, they may be feeling slightly more anxious and cautious than others, which is completely understandable. I have always said I want our reopening to be done in a way that includes as many people as possible, which is why the livestreaming was set up and why I always try to make sure that it works as well as possible. Please don’t feel pressured to return straightaway if this is you, but also please don’t feel like you aren’t welcome and like you have been forgotten. You haven’t been and you are still very much a loved member of our church family.

 

This Sunday the church marks Mothering Sunday, and whilst we are aiming to reopen next week there will be a service at 10am on Sunday 14th March. This will be a service of Holy Communion and there will be flowers available, as is custom for Mothering Sunday. Leftover posies will be available from outside church after the service. Should you wish to be present for our service on the 14th, booking will open on Wednesday morning (10th) at 9am. Those who are unable to use our online booking system should contact the office which is open between 9.30am and 1.30pm.

Going forwards there will be a service on Wednesday 17th March at 10.30am and then on Sunday 21st March the 8am, 10am and 6.30pm services will resume.

I look forwards to welcoming many of you back into our building as we resume worshipping together. As we do this, we all need to remember the public health guidance about wearing mask, keeping 2 metres apart and not mixing with people from outside our households/bubbles.

In the next few days I will be able to share more information about how we will celebrate Holy Week and Easter together but the PCC have agreed to my suggestion that we aim to celebrate Easter Sunday with one service at 10am outside on the front church field. Obviously, this will be weather dependent and a wet weather plan will be put together, but I am excited at the prospect of the whole church joining together to celebrate the joy of the resurrection on Sunday 4th April. More details to follow.

If you have any concerns or questions about St Michaels reopening please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Calum

9th March -Joseph

Joseph: Mat 1 v 18-25: ‘Joseph her husband was a righteous man’

In the course of parish ministry I attended many nativity plays in schools and churches. Understandably they don’t tend to focus on the apparently scandalous event at the heart of the story – that Mary is pregnant and Joseph is not the father. It would be fair to say that while Luke’s account of the birth of Jesus portrays Mary’s perspective, Matthew gives us more than a hint of what might have been going through Joseph’s mind as he experiences the roller coaster ride of Mary’s pregnancy.

When Joseph discovered that Mary was expecting a child, Matthew tell us that he ‘considered this’ (v 19). We might well ask what this actually involved. The Greek word used, ‘enthymeomai’, suggests that he did this with not a little emotional force. To start with, the penalty for what he understood Mary’s actions to be in being unfaithful to him as her betrothed was death by stoning (Deut 22 v 23-24) – according to the Law of Moses, her life was forfeit. Added to this, of course, was his personal sense of betrayal; how could Mary have done this? We can imagine the anger, the confusion and disappointment circling around in his mind endlessly coalescing into the same thought; ‘I just don’t understand!” Joseph was not some kind of super hero able to rise above such thoughts; he was a flesh and blood human being whose life at this precise moment was falling apart at the seams because of a scandal he would never live down. It is to his enormous credit that his intuitive thought is not about how he might take revenge according to the letter of the law but how he can save Mary’s life and reputation (v 19).

This begs the question as to why the angel came to see Mary alone rather than with Joseph. Why was he excluded from the decision making process? There isn’t a definitive answer to this question yet I would tentatively suggest that in a stiflingly patriarchal society in which all important decisions were taken by men, there is a divine marker being put down in that this most significant of choices was Mary’s to make. If we consider another Mary standing outside the tomb of Jesus and being the first the meet the risen Lord we can see that the life of Jesus is bookended with stories about the emancipation of women. For the church this profoundly challenges the exclusion of women from ordained ministry that is only now being meaningfully addressed and is still not a reality in every church tradition two thousand years later.

Joseph really comes into his own after he has his own angelic encounter in the course of a dream in which the situation is explained to him (v 20-23). He will have realised firstly that Mary, against all the odds, has not betrayed him but also that absolutely nobody else is going to believe that. ‘Do not be afraid’, says the angel to Joseph. There will be misunderstanding, ribaldry even (I wonder if and how long ‘Joseph and Mary’ jokes did the rounds in Nazareth) and a very uncertain future but Joseph is prepared to do the right thing rather than the expected thing. We can imagine comments along the lines of, ‘Joseph, what are you doing, you’re out of your mind!’ coming his way. But he knows the will of God and responds obediently. It’s why he and Mary end up on the road to Bethlehem together.

Whilst Joseph’s call to obedience in being loyal to a woman with child by the Holy Spirit (v 20) is pretty unique, our walk with Christ will sometimes involve doing the right thing rather the expected thing because there are times when they clash. St Francis was born into a family of wealthy cloth merchants who lived a life of luxury. Indeed in his youth he had something of a reputation as a party animal. Yet a period of imprisonment following a battle he was involved in wrought a complete change in him and he embraced poverty and simplicity in a way that still inspires people today (highlighted by the decision made in 2013 by Jorge Mario Bergoglio to adopt Francis as his papal name). Yet at the time Francis’s actions seemed inexplicable to those around him and, indeed, at one point he was dragged home by his father and locked in a storeroom.

There will be times when, as Christians, we are called to do things that will involve both a challenge to our own received wisdom and the possibility of us being seriously misunderstood by others. Perhaps that’s why Jesus rather ruefully reflected that ‘prophets are not accepted in their home towns’ (Luke 4 v 24). The first of these is a reminder that we will never have more than a provisional understanding of who God is and what his will for our lives might be. Just as the disciples needed to undergo a major cultural shift in embracing Gentiles as part of the Christian community, so our Christian pilgrimage sometimes involves putting what we think we know about ourselves and God to one side. The Christian life is not comfy - seeing faith with new eyes means being open to previously unimagined ways of serving Christ. The second is a reminder that when we do follow Christ with all our hearts we may speak and act in ways that don’t sit comfortably with everybody. I’m not talking here about deliberately winding people up or the kind of nonsensical and dangerous conspiracy theories that too many Christians in the United States have been taken in by in recent years. It might just be that our thoughts, our words and our actions won’t always be fully comprehensible to everyone who adopts the cultural mores of early twenty first century society and therefore following Jesus may be costly in terms of reputation and relationships (bearing in mind as we have in earlier studies that the act of following Christ in some countries means putting your life at risk).

The relationship between Joseph and his peers would never have been quite the same after his decision to stick with the woman who had apparently humiliated him in the most public way possible. Yet, although he has only a couple of brief appearances in the Bible, Joseph had a hugely formative role in the life of his adopted son Jesus. I first visited the ancient ruins of the town of Sepphoris, seven miles from Nazareth, back in 2013 on my first pilgrimage to the Holy Land. At first I wondered what we were doing there as the town makes no appearance in the New Testament. Yet there is a road, dating from the first century, running through the ruins that Joseph and Jesus would have walked along many times together. As the nearest town to the village of Nazareth Joseph and Jesus would have gone there together often in order to buy supplies and very possibly to do jobs as part of their carpentry business. It may be that the first time they went together Joseph carried his small boy on his back showing him the sights and sounds. We know that Joseph was still living when Jesus was twelve years old (Luke 2 v 41-52) but had died by the time Jesus began his ministry. God entrusted his Son to this loyal, generous, thoughtful and just man who helped lay the foundations of Jesus’ ministry by his commitment to following God’s will whatever the cost. We don’t have to be centre stage to make a difference. Even the smallest act of service can lead to unimagined healing and hope. Whilst not everyone will always ‘get’ our motives as followers of Jesus, we can take Joseph as an example of what it means to put our faith first and foremost and to live it out day by day.

 

Questions: Why do we sometimes struggle to do God’s will? How do we respond when our loyalty to Christ causes complications or misunderstandings in some area of our lives?

Prayer: Lord, thank you for Joseph’s ability to accept your will for his life. Help us in our daily lives to do what is right even when we don’t understand what’s going on. Amen.

8th March -Haggai

Haggai: Haggai 1 v 1-11: ‘Because of my house, which remains a ruin’

Have you ever looked forward to something which turned out to be a bit of a disappointment? It may have been a holiday that wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, a show that didn’t quite have the spark you were expecting or a new job that promised more than it delivered. Imagine the people of Judah returning to Jerusalem after many decades of exile during which they dreamed about but saw no possibility of going home. Even those who were born and grew up in exile would have had the city and its Temple as it was before the exile described to them vividly by their elders. As those making the journey set out for Jerusalem there would have been a certain amount of trepidation but also great anticipation; even though many of them had never been there, they were going home. The reality when they got there, of course, was a ruined Temple, a destroyed city and broken down walls. It would have been a scene of devastation and there was much hard and laborious work to be done before any glory could return!

The short book of the prophet Haggai can be dated precisely to 520 BC, a little less than 20 years after the return from exile. From the start there were major challenges exacerbated by local opposition (described in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah) and I suspect there were many moments when, rather like the Israelites of Moses’ time dreaming of the flesh pots of Egypt in the heat of the desert, the returnees ached to be back in Babylon.

Haggai’s problem was with the priorities of those rebuilding the city. Whilst people had been rebuilding their homes and actually making them very comfortable (v 4), work on building the Temple, the symbol of the nation’s identity as the people of God, had not begun (v 2). Now in one sense it seems perfectly understandable that the need to house people was made a priority; Jerusalem is a hill city and can be cold in winter. But it seems that a situation had been reached where it kept on being kicked into the long grass. From this perspective Haggai’s words are a call to action and a challenge to the people to get their priorities sorted out. One result of the fact that people are looking first and foremost to their own wants is that they are spending considerable amounts of money on unnecessary items (v 6b). Haggai pronounces that this self-orientated lifestyle will have consequences (10-11); economic disaster is on the horizon because the people have still not learned their lesson in spite of all their years in exile.

I’m writing this in lockdown during the Coronavirus pandemic soon after news that a number of vaccines will soon be available. We spent most of 2020 exiled from much of what makes up our day to day lives. We have been separated from our families and friends for weeks at a time and many families are mourning the loss of loved ones and suffering acute distress that they were not able to see or say goodbye to them before they died. Many people have been unable to go to work and have either been working from home or placed on furlough. Many have lost their jobs altogether and are facing acute financial hardship. As I write restaurants, pubs and cafes are once again closed (except for take away outlets) so it is not possible to do something as ordinary and everyday as meet friends for coffee and a catch up. Many of us have spent the vast majority if not all our time at home.

So life returning to some kind of normality, as it will little by little in 2021, is going to be a big change and it will feel a little bit like a return from exile. We may feel that, whilst the exile in Babylon described in the Bible was a result of major errors on the part of the people of Judah, the pandemic was just ‘something that happened’. Yet there is a clear link between the pandemic and the continued destruction of wildlife habitats which is placing humans and animals in closer proximity than they were intended to be thereby creating a far higher possibility of the transference of ‘zoonotic’ diseases (diseases existing in animals that can evolve to affect humans) such as COVID-19. Whilst I certainly wouldn’t call the pandemic a judgement from God (it would be very strange to think of a loving God deliberately targeting the elderly and most vulnerable), it may well be a consequence of the careless way that we are draining the earth’s resources and destroying habitats in our relentless desire to have more of everything. Haggai’s words about consuming but never being satisfied (v 6) seem awfully relevant to our situation.

Haggai’s words are remarkably applicable to our consumer orientated world; we also have holes in our purses (v 6b) yet our profligacy and love of things we want but don’t need threaten the future of the planet. You simply cannot have unlimited growth on a planet with limited resources. That is why I am hoping that as the pandemic recedes we don’t just go back to ‘normal’ but start to move on to a new normal in which the planet is not threatened by climate change, habitat destruction and global consumerism. That will require a profound change of mind for us all.

This is a vast topic and so it would perhaps be best to offer a few specific thoughts about food, drink and clothes, the aspects of careless consumerism that Haggai focuses on in verse 6 of our passage. We should be prepared to ask difficult questions about how what we eat, drink or wear has been produced all the way down the supply chain to those who grew, harvested, picked and packaged what we buy. Are those at the bottom of the chain working in a safe, clean and fair environment (bearing in mind the Rana Plaza collapse in Dhaka in 2013 which killed 1,134 clothing workers working for a company with links to a significant number of British clothing retailers who had been ordered to come to work on pain of losing a month’s wages even though it was known the building was unsafe)? Are they being paid a fair wage for their labour? Are farmers and other suppliers being paid a fair price for what they produce (whether they live in developing countries or the U.K.)? Is the purchase we are making contributing to the destruction of rainforests and/or animal habitats? What is the carbon footprint of what we buy (some producers are beginning to introduce carbon footprint labelling)? Do we already have enough of what we are purchasing and how much does impulse buying play a part in our consumption? Are we reusing plastic bags and trying to reduce the goods we buy with unnecessary plastic wrapping?

If you (or a family member or friend) have internet access ‘Ethical Consumer’ (www.ethicalconsumer.org), an independent not-for-profit website which works with a number of organisations including Christian Aid, provides a lots of helpful information on the moral implications of purchases across a wide range of goods and services that we use as consumers.

One thing we can say for sure is that Haggai is seriously challenging us, along with his contemporaries, to purchase less and give more in order to arrive at a new normal. For him, prioritising personal comfort at the expense of rebuilding the Temple symbolised the uncomfortable reality that the people had yet again turned away from God. In the same way prioritising personal comfort in a needy world today cannot be right; Haggai would certainly have a word or two to say about that! Profound change is required and Christians need to be at the heart of it.

 

Questions: As Christians what changes do we need to make in the way we use the earth’s limited resources? How do you think future generations will assess us as custodians of the planet?

Prayer: Lord, open our hearts that we may reflect a spirit of generosity in all aspects of our lives including in the way we consume the precious resources of the earth that you have created and asked us to care for. Amen. 

7th March -Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah

Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah: Daniel 3 v 1-30: ‘Look! I see four men…’

Who are these three guys, you may well ask? Whilst Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah were their Jewish birth names, we know them more familiarly by their Babylonian names of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego. Along with Daniel they were born in Judah but after Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians in 587 BC, along with many of the great and good, they were forced into exile. They quickly found that there were opportunities in King Nebuchadnezzar’s court at Babylon for bright young men and they undertook training which opened doors to highly influential positions in the king’s service (Daniel 1 v 5; 19-20).

However given that Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah were faithful Jews living and working in an alien culture with very different religious beliefs it was pretty much inevitable that they would come across a roadblock. It arrived in the shape of a ninety feet high golden image which, whilst it may or may not have been of the king himself, was designed as a very visible object of worship. Here the unstoppable force of absolute royal power meets the immovable object of a strongly held faith; every single person assembled on the plain of Dura that day, Jewish exiles included, was instructed to bow down to the statue.

From time to time in our own day, on the news or in a documentary, we see members of ruling assemblies in totalitarian states on their feet giving the dictator a standing ovation. What we are not able to see is what these acolytes are thinking privately; they all know they have no choice but to play the part of sycophants to protect their jobs and their lives. So it was for Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah – they were caught between a rock and hard place whereby they had to choose between betraying their Jewish beliefs and disobeying the king’s command.

Their loyalty to God led them to a fiery furnace blazing even hotter than the king’s anger at their disobedience. The story of their deliverance from the fire which didn’t burn a hair of their heads and the presence of a fourth (presumably angelic) human figure in the fire with them vindicates the stand they have taken and leads to profound change in Neduchanezzar. He, of course, goes the whole hog with dire consequences promised now for anybody uttering a word against ‘the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego’ (v 29). It is worth noting in passing that the king has not become a convert as a result of this remarkable deliverance, God is still ‘their own God’ (v28).

In the list of heroes of faith in Hebrews 11, the reference to those who ‘quenched the fury of the flames’ (v 34) is very likely a nod to this story. However whilst much of that chapter is about those delivered by God from all kinds of trials and tribulations, it goes on to list those whose struggles did not have such a happy outcome (v 35-38) and where there was no miraculous divine intervention to save people from prison, persecution, isolation and death.

This inconsistency of fate for those whose faith leads to conflict with religious and political leaders continues in the New Testament. Whilst James is put to death by the sword (Acts 12 v 2), Peter is subsequently rescued from incarceration by an angel (Acts 12 v 6-10). This surely does not mean that Peter mattered more than James. Testimonies from the 260 million Christians persecuted for their faith today suggest the same pattern (or lack of it). Whilst some, either through their own efforts or with help from organisations supporting them such as Open Doors (www.opendoorsuk.org), have been able to support themselves and live in safety, others have suffered less happy outcomes. The week before these words were written 39 people were murdered in the Democratic Republic of Congo just because they were Christians. It is estimated that between 50,000 and 70,000 Christians are being held in appalling conditions in labour camps in North Korea because of their faith.

Whilst there are many wonderful stories of answers to prayers and an enormous amount of prayerful work continues to be done in support of Christians who live day by day with the threats of losing their jobs, families or even their lives, not everybody can be brought into a safe place.

Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah, were denounced by their colleagues out of jealousy (v 8), no doubt, at their rise through the ranks of the government administration. Their answer after they were hauled before the king speaks volumes. They did have faith that God will deliver them from the fiery furnace and yet, ‘…even if he does not, we want you to know, O king, that we will not serve your gods…’ (v 18). They were fully prepared to pay the price if on this occasion there is no divine intervention. There is an implicit acknowledgement here that God is not always at hand with a ‘get out of jail free’ card but there is a loyalty to God that will face the consequences, whatever they may be.

In our own lives there may well be moments when the situation we find ourselves in leads to a potential conflict with our faith. We may not be taken off to prison or murdered for our beliefs but we might be ostracised, laughed at, marginalised, scorned or misunderstood. In our working life we may be asked to collude with a decision that, for instance, unnecessarily threatens people’s livelihoods here or overseas or that involves, at the very least, being economical with the truth. It might be that saying no to something we know to be wrong costs a friendship or carries a financial penalty. There are some tough choices to be made sometimes and the consequences of doing the right thing (or not doing the wrong thing) can be unpredictable.

Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah remind us that loyalty to God has to come first and that our lives need to be shaped around our faith rather than the other way round.  This will sometimes require much prayerful thinking; knowing what is the right course of action can be difficult to fathom and there may well be subtle nuances to take into account. There may be problems whichever way we look! Faith can be costly. Jesus not only gave up the joy of heaven but lived a life of service that took him inevitably to the cross (Phil 2 v 6-8). Whilst Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah emerged unharmed from the heat of the fire, there was no divine rescue from the agony of crucifixion for Jesus; no legions of angels appeared to carry him to safety as he was arrested, tried, mocked, sentenced, flogged and killed.

Yet that was not where the story ended; if it was then all those who have suffered for doing the right thing, including Jesus, would have suffered in vain. It is the resurrection that points us to a hope that takes us beyond such things as fiery furnaces to the righting of all wrongs and injustices as God’s kingdom of love, peace and fullness of life prevails. The writer of Hebrews has a vision of Christ at the right hand of God and exhorts us to ‘not grow weary and lose heart’ (Heb 12 v 3). Whatever difficulties, contradictions and costly decision making we may have to endure, our living hope is focused on an inheritance that, as Peter puts it, ‘can never perish, spoil or fade, (1 Peter 1 v 4).

 

Questions: Have you ever experienced conflict at work or in any other context between what you have asked to do and what you knew to be right? How did you resolve the dilemma?

Prayer: Lord, guide us when we have difficult decisions to make and need to know the right course of action. Give us the strength to do what we know is right and to be the people you want us to be. Amen.